Any attempt by the United States to intervene or play any kind of role in Iraq must be even-handed. We must recognize the legitimate interests of all the various factions: the Shiite majority, the Sunni minority, and the Kurds in Iraq; but at the same time we must not show preference for any one of these groups. In particular, we must not be seen as attacking ISIS alone while defending the pro-Shiite, pro-Iranian regime of Maliki.
Of course, as I have written repeatedly in the last week, it would be much easier to influence and shape the situation in Iraq if Obama had not withdrawn all American troops from that country. If we had American troops on the ground, then, the purpose of these troops could be to stand as a moderating, mediating, peace-keeping force between the various factions. Now, instead, we find ourselves in a situation where our only means of affecting the outcome is to attack one faction or the other.
Obama’s decision to withdraw all American troops has placed us in an impossible situation. But, before we mount bombers and drones against any faction in Iraq, we need to ask ourselves how such an attack will be interpreted by the parties on the other side and whether those parties we attack will attack us in retribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment